This is a small talk, you can take a look at it if you want to.

The First Court: The US court organization is divided into two major systems: federal courts and state courts. They apply their own constitutions and laws, and have jurisdiction over different cases and regions. The federal court system consists of district courts, appellate courts, and the Supreme Court.

The state court system is highly fragmented, generally consisting of state courts of first instance, state courts of appeals, and state supreme courts.

Second Judge: Judges are subject to a non-replaceable system, a full-time system, a high-paying system, and a retirement system.

Judges should be completely neutral and objective. Judges are not involved in fighting crimes, and the prosecution should maintain a neutral attitude towards the defense.

The third prosecutor: federal prosecutors, state prosecutors, and county prosecutors, most of them are elected and do not accept fate.

The vast majority of cases in the United States are prosecuted by county prosecutors, who are not responsible to anyone.

District prosecutors in the United States have great power. They are all lawyers and are elected. Of course, after losing the election, they may still go back to be lawyers. Many times, it will be found that the lawyers and prosecutors of the prosecution and defense in the court are actually classmates and teachers. It is very beneficial to reach a 'prosecution and defense transaction', so it is very important to have a network of lawyers.

The Fifth Amendment to the Federal Constitution stipulates that no one shall suffer life or bodily harm twice for the same criminal act. public prosecution.

A loophole can be exploited here. For example, if someone commits a crime, if they are tried in place A, they may be convicted of a felony, then switch to county B. Because of the unspeakable relationship with the district attorney and the judge, the sentence can be very light, and the sentence After that, the crime cannot be pursued elsewhere.

A more typical example is the 'King of Chicago' Capone. The Valentine's Day massacre attracted national attention, and was eventually forced to surrender by gangsters across the United States, but at the same time, he reached an agreement with a local prosecutor, and he was sentenced to only one year...

The other is Michael Jackson. Because of the crazy bite of the district attorney, the sexual immersion case has been entangled for many years.

I, the Public Procuratorate and the Law are all judicial organs, but in the United States, only the courts are the judicial organs.

There is no cooperation between the public security, procuratorate and law. The court is absolutely neutral and does not cooperate with any institution. Of course, this is the case in theory. However, the law of the sea has been developed for many years, and there are various restrictions in this area, which is already very fair. jury.

Also, let's talk about prosecutors and the U.S. police.

In the United States, human rights are very important, and the rights of the police are greatly restricted.

Let me give you an example, such as reconnaissance.

The police can conduct some investigation methods without the consent of the judge and prosecutor. These investigation methods are the most basic and have little impact on the rights of citizens.

For example, if an ordinary witness himself does not arouse criminal suspicion, the police can completely question him. To gather some evidence, the police are not too restricted except to search and ask for special documents.

However, many investigative methods involve civil rights, especially the right to privacy. The police cannot make their own decisions and must obtain the approval of a judge before taking action.

Take searches, for example. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution early on mentioned that searches must be approved by a court. The police must contact the Prosecutor's Office and help him apply for a judge's approval for a search. The constitution stipulates that citizens have the right not to be unreasonably searched.

The evidence obtained by unreasonable search is innumerable. For example, in the case of Simpson murdering his wife, it was indeed his murder, which is known throughout the United States. void.

Of course, this 'unreasonable search' is more legally flexible, and it all depends on whether your legal team is strong enough.

For example, eavesdropping is considered by our law to be a detection method that has the greatest impact on civil rights. A citizen does not know that government officials are eavesdropping on his conversations~www.mtlnovel.com~ This has a very large impact on his privacy rights. .

The condition of wiretapping is simply that when other detection methods are ineffective, there is a lot of evidence to prove that there is likely to be a conversation related to a crime in that place or that phone. At the same time, wiretapping can only be used when there is a more important crime.

In the end, if the prosecutors feel that the conditions are met, they must obtain approval from the headquarters of the US Department of Justice before they can apply for the approval of the judge, and only after the approval of the judge can the wiretapping be conducted.

Others include accessing bank accounts, etc... The supervision and restrictions received by the police are very large.

In this book, as long as Sean gets the District Attorney, basically the police will have nothing to do with Sean.

For example, when the district attorney was elected, he pushed his own people up~

Finally, let's talk about the jury. There are big and small juries. The small jury has a sentence of less than one year.

Generally speaking, the laws of the United States are already the most complex and fairest. They treat all people fairly and openly, no matter if you are the president or an asshole. Of course, if you cannot afford a good lawyer, then It's your own problem, not the law itself.

There is a kind of lawyers and prosecutors in the United States who like to stare at big companies and bite big companies. The fame and fortune they can get once they win the case are beyond imagination. Therefore, it is not just about being rich and powerful. After all, anyone And the company's radiation range is limited.

What's more, there are the Donkey Party and the Elephant Party, as well as competitors.

Okay, let's just say something casually, I have also learned all seven and six, so what I said was a bit messy.

The question is, what am I doing to study legal loopholes in such a stupid way? ? ?